Change in Patterns of Failure After Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: Analysis From the RetroEMBRACE Study.

PURPOSE: Image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer improves pelvic control and survival across all stages. Improvement in pelvic control is larger in advanced stages, but improvement in survival is similar across stages. This paper analyzes the patterns of failure in the RetroEMBRACE cohort to investigate this discrepancy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 731 patients from 12 institutions treated with chemoradiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography-based IGABT were evaluated. The pattern of failure at time of first relapse was analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-five failures (single and synchronous) occurred in 222 of 731 patients (30%). Among the 325 failures, 9% were local and 6% regional. Pelvic (local or regional) failures made up 13%, paraaortic node (PAN) 9%, systemic 21%, and distant (systemic + PAN) 24%. Of the 222 patients with treatment failure, 21% had pelvic failure alone, 57% had distant failure alone, and 23% had both pelvic and distant failure. Of all failures that occurred, 40% to 50% occurred in the first year, with a further 20% to 30% occurring in the second year. Although local, regional, and PAN failure tended to plateau after year 3, systemic failure continued to occur up to year 10. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of IGABT has changed the patterns of relapse after chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer. The predominant failure after IGABT is systemic, whereas the predominant failure with conventional brachytherapy is pelvic. Effective treatments to eradicate micrometastases in PAN and distant organs are needed in addition to IGABT and chemoradiation therapy to maximize local, regional, PAN, and systemic control and improve survival.

Additional value of PET-CT in staging of clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer.

To evaluate retrospectively the accuracy of integrated PET/CT, against PET, CT, or conventional staging in breast cancer. Seventy consecutive biopsy proven clinical stage IIB and III breast cancer patients were included. Descriptive statistics of integrated PET/CT for the primary tumor, nodal status and metastasis detection were compared to PET, CT with contrast, and conventional staging (biochemistry, chest X-ray, liver ultrasound, and bone scintigraphy). Sensitivity of PET/CT for primary tumor and nodal status was 97.1% and 62.5%, respectively. Specificity and negative predictive value for nodal status were 100% and 66.6%, respectively. The values for conventional staging for nodal involvement were 100% and 85.7% with a sensitivity of 87.5%. PET/CT showed metastatic disease in seven women despite normal conventional staging. PET/CT is able to visualize most clinical stage IIB and III primary breast cancers. PET/CT is superior to conventional staging for detecting internal mammary chain nodes and metastatic disease, but not for axillary staging. Future studies will have to test whether therapy adjustment based on PET/CT has the potential to improve survival.